Implementing a payment orchestration platform requires a strategic approach to ensure seamless integration, optimal transaction routing, and compliance with security regulations. Businesses have two primary options for implementation: developing an in-house solution or outsourcing to a third-party payment orchestration provider. Each approach has its own advantages and challenges, depending on the company’s resources, expertise, and long-term goals.
Below, we compare these two methods in detail.
In-house development
Building a payment orchestration platform internally gives businesses complete control over their financial infrastructure. This approach is often favored by enterprises with extensive development teams and specific customization needs.
Advantages of in-house development
Businesses can design their payment orchestration system to meet specific needs, ensuring complete alignment with internal workflows and business objectives.
- Direct integration with internal systems
In-house development allows for seamless integration with proprietary systems such as ERP, CRM, and fraud detection tools.
Challenges of in-house development
- High development and maintenance costs
Creating and maintaining a payment orchestration system requires significant investment in infrastructure, skilled developers, and ongoing maintenance.
- Complex compliance requirements
Companies must ensure their system meets international security standards (PCI DSS, PSD2, etc.), which can be resource-intensive.
Outsourcing to a Payment Orchestration Provider
Outsourcing payment orchestration involves partnering with a third-party provider that offers a ready-made platform with built-in integrations, automation, and security compliance. This option is ideal for businesses looking for a fast and cost-effective solution.
Advantages of Outsourcing
Businesses can integrate a third-party payment orchestration platform within weeks, rather than months, significantly reducing time to market.
Instead of investing in development, companies pay for a service that includes maintenance, updates, and compliance management.
- Access to advanced features
Third-party providers offer pre-integrated payment gateways, fraud detection tools, and dynamic routing, reducing the need for manual intervention.
Challenges of outsourcing
While third-party platforms offer flexible features, they may not provide the same level of customization as an in-house solution.
- Dependency on external providers
Businesses rely on the provider’s infrastructure, which means potential risks in case of downtime or service limitations.